Is the writ of execution used to garnish my wages valid?
I live in California. I found out on November 14, 2012 that there was a default judgment not in my favor, but my feeling has been all along that the papers I have in my hand prove that proper civil procedures were not followed. When looking at the relevant civil code, the first thing mentioned is that there should be a date that the writ was issued; my document has no such date. In fact, what is there is a stamped name. The document in the case file is slightly different than the document I was delivered (the day the money was taken out.) The document has holes on the top as though it was taken from a pre-existing case. I can see the white out lines underneath both Los Angeles and the date the judgment was entered. The fonts are different within the actual document.
I point this out because I did a document of my own to prove it can be done. The document that was not in the case file does not have a payment marker, but the document in the file does. The document that was not in the case file has a court stamp, but the document in the case file does. When I went to the courthouse holding the file to see what was going on, I received a receipt for the copies. The format of the receipt is different. It was my understanding that the writ of execution was to come from the same place.
I have asked myself several questions since my money was taken out. Why was there a substitution of attorney? Why did the original lawyer never send a demand for payment? Why did the company go all the way to Sacramento to get a lawyer when they don't live in Sacramento and neither do I? This is my supposition. Someone must not have known that I filed a response to the court summons in the proper format and within the given time. They proceeding with the case without informing me. They petitioned for the court clerk to issue a default judgment. They were then to go to the judge and get the writ of execution, but there is no signed order by a judge.
The original lawyer must have realized this and didn't proceed for 3 years before the substitution of attorney took place. The company then went to Sacramento and hired a lawyer who wound not have proper access to the case file. The new lawyers created a writ of execution and doctored it up a bit and took it to the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department at the courthouse and presented it. They then had a copy filed in the case file.
I come to this conclusion because of all the little mistakes found on the documents and between the documents. I come to this conclusion because it seems to be that if there is a valid order for a writ of execution, the copy should be clean, free of any type overs. The second most important item for the writ of execution is the signature. I believe they needed a document with a signature and that is why they used a pre-existing form.
Reply from DebtCollectionAnswers.com:
We recommend you talk with a consumer law attorney right away. You may want to talk with Robert Brennan at BrennanLaw.com. He helped coauthor the California edition of our ebook and has a lot of experience dealing with debt collection lawsuits.
Click here to post comments
Return to Debt Collection Questions.
Learn how debt collection laws can help you!
This website does not provide legal advice.
All information is for educational purposes only.
Copyright 2007 - 2020 by Mary Reed and Gerri Detweiler.
All rights reserved.
DebtCollectionAnswers.com does not sell your personal information.